How to measure circularity?

The development of a circularity indicator that can be used by companies is very recent: in May 2015, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation introduced a material circularity index (MCI) [1], which measures the rate of regeneration of material flows. This indicator measures the performance of a product or a company in a circular context and thereby assesses what still needs to be done to get away from the linear model.

However, the circularization of resources is not a sufficient criterion. It is analysed not as a goal in itself, but in terms of impacts induced and structural changes. The approach naturally leads to multidimensional indicators.

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation therefore proposes to add “complementary indicators” to the MCI concerning water, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, etc. and “risk indicators” such as scarcity, toxicity, etc.

This inevitably raises the question of arbitration between the different indicators: is a company that consumes fewer resources but more energy more “circular” than one that consumes less energy and more resources?

To get over this debate, S. Kampelmann [2] provides an analysis of circularity which is based on the socio-economic systems theory: economic activity evolves in social-ecological systems and light is shed on its assessment by biophysical (ecosystems, flows, natural cycles, etc.) and anthropogenic elements (institutions, rules, stakeholders, etc.). This approach suggests a circularization initiative as a social-ecological trajectory. [3]

For example, in an article on the management of organic matter in Brussels, it can compare two radically different paths towards greater circularity of organic flows, and assess them with respect to their social and environmental implications together with a series of economic indicators.


1. Material Circularity Indicator (MCI)

2. Stephan Kampelmann, Mesurer l’économie circulaire à l’échelle territoriale, une analyse systémique de la gestion des matières organiques à Bruxelles (Measuring the circular economy at local level: a systemic analysis of the management of organic matter in Brussels) -

3. Sabine Barles “The main characteristics of urban socio-ecological trajectories: Paris (France) from the 18th to the 20th century” -


Source: ECLAIRA - Newsletter Number 6 / March 2017

Newsletter edited by CIRIDD with support from Région Auvergne - Rhône-Alpes

See all the ECLAIRA newsletters


Illustration credits: FOTOLIA

Moderated by : Traduction Birdwell

Other news in "Information"

Editorial of the 11th ECLAIRA newsletter: Bringing nature into the centre of innovation

Published on 06 sept. 2018 - 13:25

Produced by CIRIDD with support from the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, ECLAIRA's eleventh newsletter is entitled “Bringing nature into the centre of innovation” EDITORIAL The Rencontres de l’économie circulaire were attended by over (...)

[FOCUS ENTREPRISE] Pic Bois: saving and protect wood resources through complementary initiatives

Published on 30 août 2018 - 10:48

Pic Bois manufactures tourist signage and leisure furniture for leisure parks, ski resorts and hiking trails. The company was created in 1990 based on a wood engraving process, and its activity has evolved has tourism in France has (...)

[REGIONAL FOCUS ] Citeau: a virtuous water cycle

Published on 30 août 2018 - 10:45

Located in Belleville, in the Rhône department, the Intercommunal water treatment centre (Centre Intercommunal de Traitement de l’Eau - CITEAU) was designed to be an ideas laboratory dedicated to sustainable development and a site (...)

 Tools and schemes


Enter your own keyword

Other news